![]() As long as the United States buys aircraft carriers, the high/low mix debate will continue. John McCain searching for alternatives: in January 2017, the Arizona senator released a white paper, “ Restoring American Power ,” that called for a “high/low mix” of aircraft carriers, possibly involving a variant of the America-class amphibious transport equipped with the short-takeoff and vertical-landing version of the Joint Strike Fighter. The costs of the new Ford-class carriers have even seapower advocates as Sen. The Navy pressed on with an all-supercarrier fleet, and today the entire carrier fleet is composed of nuclear-powered supercarriers. The advantages of larger ships were so significant that, as it could afford the larger ships, the Navy would continue to buy them. Photo courtesy of Erickson’s twitter Youve read 0 of 5 of today’s most popular posts. Finally, the increasing importance of new operating areas such as the Persian Gulf stretched existing resources.ĭespite the proposed advantages of the Medium Aircraft Carrier the disadvantages of the smaller platform ultimately made it unattractive. Erick Ericksonthe influential conservative blogger, Atlanta-area radio host, and Fox News talking headpublished a curious claim on Twitter this past Monday, which marked the 74th anniversary of. Spreading naval aviation out among more platforms made it more resistant to individual wartime carrier losses. For the first time in decades the number of carriers dropped below twenty, making it increasingly unlikely that enough flight decks would be available during a conventional war to service all requirements. ![]() ![]() There were also advantages in building more, smaller carriers. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |